Gezi Occupy is a Arap Spring ?? Absolutyly not !
On
May 2013 Turkey, great echoes to create, in 79 cities support will, to raise
their awareness, defy the rights to request, to be heard would want a morning
wake would .11 years has been around since the government's pluralistic
democracy imposed impositions against spark a big fire would occur. This event
will be called the actions of trips to parks and apolitical actions of the
youth turkey known their political, legal and most importantly, living
conditions, living conditions for the removal of a head, screaming will occur.
These actions, marches, demonstrations, or to support, rather than just stand
in the face and examined theoretically and interpretation / review must be
submitted. In this article, the basic human need for action gezi occupy, social
identity and structural violence are under investigation.
Firstly basic human needs ,According
to Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs he wanted to understand what motivates people.
He believed that individuals possess a set of motivation systems unrelated to rewards or unconscious desires. And first line of human needs :Biological and Physiological needs. second
Safety needs - protection from elements, security, order, law, limits,
stability, freedom from fear.in Turkey since 2002, the existing government of
Turkey for the period of 11 years from 50%, and they act for 50% after
received. In this process, government did not respect basic human needs the
remaining half of the Turkish people, make restrictions on them day by day. For
example abortion law, alcohol restriction, freedom of expression, on the
Internet restrictions and censorship, restrictions of freedom of information,
intervention shelter for girls and boys and need for recognition. These sanctions
rather than managing people to rule
people and make a presuare on their life. %80 of people who participate the
gezioccupy against the intervention of their life style and basic human beings
crate a life style. The other %50 peaople of turkey who als have basic needs
want to be say , we are here and we have basic human needs, respect .
Secondly
about social idendity ,A social identity is the portion of an individual's self-concept derived
from perceived membership in a relevant social
group. In the Social Identity Theory, a
person has not one, “personal self”, but rather several selves that correspond
to widening circles of group membership. Different social contexts may trigger
an individual to think, feel and act on basis of his personal, family or
national “level of self”. Social Identity Theory asserts that group membership
creates ingroup/ self-categorization and enhancement in ways that favor the
in-group at the expense of the out-group. The examples (minimal group studies)
of Turner and Tajfel (1986) showed that the mere act of individuals categorizing themselves as group members was sufficient to
lead them to display ingroup favoritism.
Gezi occupy social identity
theory was first necessary to look through the 2007 elections, the rhetoric may
be useful to mention. After the 2007 elections, the AKP received 46.47% votes
and one of two people that voted for the AKP emerged. İf ıwouldnot vote, you
voted for JDP. And the people you and I.
Citizens have a distinction as AKP voters and do not vote for akp those. Moreover its enter citizens mind
slowly which are not awere of this status.
In
a survey at gezi occupy in the actions of activists belonging to any party they
feel has been observed .but participation in these actions is most intense in
the days changed just 20% of those activists feel that they belong to any party
that has been seen . of which party they may be support or they may be members
of political thought their think only they are anti- AKP .
At
time of gezi occupy Prime minister’s words and sentences r led to the deepening of social identity he
said ‘çapulcu , ayyaş ‘ and these words are used on the social networks also
used pseudonyms looters and this social
identity turn to political identity which is fan of akp anti-akp.. In addition
to forming social identity in turkey football team is one of the biggest
factors trip to the park in the
formation of social identity in action created by football soccer fans
completely forget about social identity in opposition to AKP is apparent that
the existing social impersonation .On the other hand People who don’t support
gezi occupy and Turkish prime minister have given support to this event was
seen as the clear on social networks. 50% made this distinction in social
identity theory and these people make their own social relations.
Finally structural violence in the gezioccupy ,Structural violence refers to
systematic ways in which social structures harm or
otherwise disadvantage individuals. Structural violence is subtle, often
invisible, and often has no one specific person who can (or will) be held
responsible. According to Johan
GaltungInstitutionalized elitism, ethnocentrism, classism, racism, sexism, adultism,nationalism, heterosexism and ageism are
some examples of structural violence. İn this assay explain structural violence
in gezi occupy as classism which is prejudice or discrimination on the
basis of social
class. It
includes individual attitudes and behaviors, systems of policies and practices
that are set up to benefit the upper classes at the expense of the lower classes.
If we look the classism at turkey with use the gezioccupy , easily show the
classism with religion which used by government. AKP government's closeness to
religion was obvious since 2002. but day in and day AKP government collect
votes and made politics with usin religion. And this make a classes in turkey
which are religious and not religious people. Citizensdont have to be religious
and a lot of people start to fear theocracy. Also JDP government want to some
constitutional changes which seen about theocracy morever government did not
care about national days which have importance for Turkish Republic .day by day
This make a physiological pressure on non religious people who on the streets
in gezi occupy .
In conclusion gezi occupy shows the real face of
people who are against to the government which is a disrespectful for basic
human needs , is dividing citizens and is make a class distinction on people .
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder